Deliverables
Technical deliverables completed to date
WP1 - Development of standard platforms, reference surfaces and measurement methods
Deliverable |
Deliverable description |
1.1.1 |
Requirements document outlining the requirements for all activities in WP1-4 |
1.1.2 |
Two protocols for the production of planar standard platforms on silicon oxides and gold |
1.1.3 |
Acquisition of the appropriate carbohydrate probes |
1.1.4 |
Acquisition of the appropriate peptide and protein probes |
1.1.5 |
Protocol for preparation of a planar carbohydrate reference surface, and a carbohydrate reference array |
1.1.6 |
Production of planar carbohydrate reference surface samples and arrays, as per the requirements document for JRP HLT04 |
1.1.7 |
Protocol for the preparation of at least two planar protein reference surfaces |
1.1.8 |
Protocol for the preparation of at least four planar peptide reference surfaces |
1.1.9 |
Production of planar peptide and protein reference surface samples, as per the requirements document for JRP HLT04 |
1.1.10 |
Uncertainty budget for measuring probe density on planar surfaces |
1.2.1 |
XPS data of the investigative phase of Task 1.1 |
1.2.2 |
XPS data of platforms and surfaces produced in Task 1.1 |
1.2.3 |
QCM and ellipsometry data during linker and passivator attachment to substrates and probe attachment to platforms |
1.2.4 |
ToF-SIMS and infrared data from platforms and surfaces |
1.2.5 |
Three analytical protocols (QCM, ellipsometry, ToF-SIMS), to measure the density of linker and probe molecules |
1.2.6 |
Uncertainty budgets and traceability chains for the analytical approaches which demonstrate repeatability to better than 10% |
1.2.7 |
Good practice guide describing protocols, comparability of methods and uncertainties for QCM, ellipsometry, ToF-SIMS |
1.3.1 |
Production of reference NP surface samples |
1.3.2 |
Data sets from XPS, DLS, DCS and zeta potential for NP substrates, standard NP platforms and reference NP surfaces |
1.3.3 |
Data sets from SAXS for NP substrates, standard NP platforms and reference NP surfaces |
1.3.4 |
Protocol on traceable size determination for NP substrates, standard NP platforms and reference NP surfaces using SAXS |
1.3.5 |
Protocol on surface chemistry determination using XPS for NP substrates, standard NP platforms and reference NP surfaces |
1.3.6 |
Protocol on size and density determination protocols using DLS and DCS for NP substrates, standard NP platforms and reference NP surfaces |
1.3.7 |
Report on the ability of zeta potential measurements to provide information on the number of attached probes per NP |
1.4.1 |
Protocol outlining the quality control of the production of reference carbohydrate microarray, protein and peptide surfaces |
1.4.2 |
Protocol outlining the quality control of the production of reference NPs |
1.4.3 |
Validation of quality control methods for planar reference surfaces by XPS and SIMS |
1.4.4 |
Report detailing the quality control methods for planar reference surfaces by XPS and SIMS, optical methods (fluorescence, IR spectroscopy) and water contact angle measurements. |
1.4.5 |
Recommendations, to ensure a reasonable shelf life, will be made |
1.5.1 |
Submission of the inter-laboratory comparison as a VAMAS project |
1.5.2 |
Confirmation of at least 10 participants for the inter-lab comparison |
1.5.3 |
Flow chart showing the organisation of the inter-lab comparison |
1.5.4 |
Production of sufficient planar reference surfaces for all participating laboratories |
1.5.5 |
Confirmation that all reference samples have been delivered to the participants in the inter-lab comparison |
WP2 - Investigation into the sensitivity of emerging techniques to biomolecular structure
Deliverable number |
Deliverable description |
2.1.1 |
The dependence of spectral intensities in GCIB-SIMS to surface concentration using planar peptide reference surfaces developed in task 1.1 |
2.1.2 |
Measurements of the sensitivity of SIMS to effects such as molecular size, attachment method, orientation and denaturation |
2.1.3 |
Measurements of the ability of GCIB-SIMS to distinguish structurally similar molecules at surfaces |
2.1.4 |
Recommendations for data analysis and the optimum size and energy of the cluster ion |
2.1.5 |
Measurements of the sensitivity of GCIB-SIMS to changes in probe structure |
2.1.6 |
A method for determining the identity of the probe structure using GCIB-SIMS |
2.1.7 |
Data from the application of the methods developed for planar peptide reference surfaces to planar protein reference surfaces and planar carbohydrate reference surfaces |
2.1.8 |
An analytical procedure describing the methods for data interpretation for GCIB-SIMS |
2.2.1 (REG(TUB) D1.5) |
Final design of the UHV compatible liquid cells |
2.2.2 |
Confirmation of the biomolecular sample systems to be investigated |
2.2.3 (REG(TUB) D1.6) |
Production of at least 10 UHV compatible liquid cells |
2.2.4 (REG(TUB) D1.7) |
Report on the testing of the UHV compatible liquid cells |
2.2.5 |
Protocol for generating the reference surfaces, from task 1.1, with at least three different probe densities |
2.2.6 |
Data verifying that the probes have been reproduced on at least three different probe densities on the windows of the UHV compatible liquid cells by XPS |
2.2.7 |
Protocol describing the method for optimising the angular and energetic range of GIXRF-NEXAFS for biomolecules attached at the Si/SiO2 interface of the UHV compatible liquid cell windows |
2.2.8 (REG (TUB) D1.9) |
Data from GIXRF-NEXAFS experiments in the soft x-ray range, to derive the chemical binding state of biomolecules deposited at the Si/SiO2 interface of the thin Si3N4 membrane of the UHV compatible liquid cells |
WP3 - Measuring the attachment of targets to reference surfaces
Deliverable number |
Deliverable description |
3.1.1 |
Confirmation of the bound targets chosen for task 3.1 |
3.1.2 |
Measurements of the amount of bound target using in-situ ellipsometry and QCM-D |
3.1.3 |
Estimation of the binding affinities and dissociation rates between target and reference surface |
3.1.4 |
Estimation of the dynamic measurements equilibrium and rate constants for the binding |
3.1.5 |
Repeatability and uncertainty budget for the amount of bound target will be established |
3.2.2 |
Confirmation of the selection of labelled biomolecule for task 3.2 |
3.2.3 |
At least one labelled biomolecule in sufficient quantities for molecular orientation experiments using XRF/NEXAFS |
3.2.6 |
X-ray spectrometric investigations in a UHV-compatible liquid cell for different stages of target binding to the diagnostic Si interface of the membrane. |
3.3.1 |
Confirmation of the choice of designated targets and one non-target to be used in task 3.3 |
3.3.2 |
Size measurements using DLS and DCS of the reference nanoparticle surfaces from D1.3.1. |
3.3.3 |
Report on the assessment of the possibility of measuring target binding through changes in optical absorption or zeta potential |
3.3.4 |
Measurements of target binding on the reference nanoparticle surfaces from D1.3.1. |
3.3.5 |
Diameter of core-shell nanoparticles after attachment of the target determined using SAXS |
3.3.6 |
Uncertainty analysis on the SAXS method from D3.3.5, and determination of the limit of detection. |
3.3.7 |
Report on methods for determining the diameter of the reference NP surfaces in following the attachment of targets. |
3.4.1 |
Software plan of the physical model to be implemented in the numerical code for the biomolecular simulation software, focusing on PB and MD models |
3.4.2 |
Numerical analysis software based on PB equation and its integration into a MD numerical model for the simulation of the binding mechanism |
3.4.3 |
Report on the comparison between measured and experimental results on binding affinity as a function of probe type |
3.4.4 |
Report on the comparison between measured and experimental results on binding affinity as a function of probe orientation |
3.4.5 |
Design rules, suitable for end-users, on the definition of the optimal density and orientation of probes at a surface in order to obtain the most reproducible diagnostic response |
WP4 - Novel microscopic and mass spectrometry methods for identifying and measuring target binding
Deliverable number |
Deliverable description |
4.1.1 REG(Chalmers) D1.5 |
New prototype instrument based on waveguide optics and TIRF-microscopy for single target detection using liposome-conjugated probes. |
4.1.2 REG(Chalmers) D2.1 |
Confirmation of the selection of a suitable probe-target pair for task 4.1 |
4.1.3 REG(Chalmers) D2.2 |
Procedure for the conjugation of the antibodies to the liposome and surface |
4.1.4 REG(Chalmers) D2.3 |
Investigation into the effect of varying probe concentration on the surface and in solution using the probe-target pair for task 4.1 |
4.1.5 REG(Chalmers) D2.4 |
Evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity and quantification capability of the waveguide-based method to detect the target |
4.1.6 REG(Chalmers) D2.5 |
Procedure for the optimisation of existing TIRF-microscopy based assays designed for single target detection using liposome-conjugated probes |
4.1.7 REG(Chalmers) D2.6 |
Confirmation of the choice of samples to be used to evaluate the ability of the liposome-based TIRF method for detecting multiplexed proteins in a selected real biological sample (e.g. blood serum) |
4.1.8 REG(Chalmers) D2.7 |
Evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity and quantification capability of the method to detect amyloid-β peptides in complex samples using the TIRF assay |
4.1.9 REG(Chalmers) D2.8 |
Multiplexed protein detection using TIRF and liposomes with different organic dyes |
4.1.10 REG(Chalmers) D2.9 |
Report on the evaluation of the all-polymer waveguide-based assay and comparison with TIRF using the chosen amyloid-β peptides and the probe density of a biorecognition substrate |
4.2.1 |
Procedure for an imaging MS based method for single target detection using liposome-conjugated antibodies |
4.2.2 |
Protocol for the verification of preparation steps of the imaging MS based method using QCM-D and fluorescence microscopy |
4.2.3 REG(Chalmers) D3.1 |
Confirmation of the selected suitable probe-target pair for task 4.2 |
4.2.4 |
Procedure for conjugation of the selected probes to the liposome and surface |
4.2.5 REG(Chalmers) D3.2 |
Detection of surface-immobilised liposomes using the developed imaging TOF-SIMS based method |
4.2.6 |
Investigation into the effect of varying probe concentration on the surface and in solution using the probe-target pair for task 4.2 |
4.2.7 |
Report on the evaluation of the developed imaging TOF-SIMS based method with respect to sensitivity, specificity and quantification capability for a single target |
4.2.11 REG(Chalmers) D3.5 |
Confirmation of the samples selected to evaluate the ability of the imaging TOF-SIMS based method for detecting multiplexed proteins in a selected real biological samples (e.g. blood serum) |
4.3.1 |
Procedure for ambient MS methods for the detection and identification of single probes and targets on planar reference surfaces |
4.3.2 |
Report on the evaluation of the ambient MS based detection methods with respect to their sensitivity, specificity and reliability |
4.3.3 |
Report on the effect of molecular weight and protein composition on the detection efficiency of the ambient MS based detection methods |
4.3.4 |
Optimised procedure for ambient MS methods including recommendations on the applicability of the methods for diagnostic application |
4.3.5 |
Confirmation of the selected targets and probes to be used for ambient MS based methods to image reference arrays |
4.3.6 |
Measurements using ambient MS based methods to image reference arrays, and identify the targets bound to different probe spots. |
4.3.7 |
Procedure for quantifying the amount of bound target on the reference arrays using the ambient MS based methods |